Contact

Dr. Bart Kempenaers
Phone:+49 8157 932-334Fax:+49 8157 932-400
Dr. Sabine Spehn
Press and Public Relations Seewiesen
Phone:+49 8157 932-421Fax:+49 8157 932-209

Original publication

Peter Santema & Bart Kempenaers
Complete brood failure in an altricial bird is almost always associated with the sudden and permanent disappearance of a parent.
DOI

Video

Evolution: infidelity with benefits

Selecting the right partner is vital also in the world of blue tits. If you have to feed up to 10 hungry chicks, good teamwork is everything. But does that mean you have to live in a monogamous partnership? And is it really the best strategy for reproductive success?

Related articles

In populations with an unbalanced adult sex ratio, male plovers take care of the young

Demography influences parental care in plovers

April 25, 2018

In populations with an unbalanced adult sex ratio, male plovers take care of the young [more]
Long-term study in house sparrows shows a transgenerational age effect

Progeny of old parents have fewer offspring

March 09, 2015

Long-term study in house sparrows shows a transgenerational age effect [more]

Brood failure in blue tits

Brood failure in blue tits is almost always due to the loss of a parent

June 12, 2018

Complete brood failure in blue tits is almost always associated with the sudden and permanent disappearance of one of the parents. Peter Santema and Bart Kempenaers from the Max Planck Institute for Ornithology in Seewiesen show in their study that the remaining parent substantially increased its effort to raise at least some of the chicks, which turned out to be successful in two thirds of the nests. Single parent males generally do worse, probably because they are not able to keep their chicks warm.

Apart from being a popular garden feeder visitor, blue tits have been the focus of much research on the causes and consequences of variation in reproductive success. Blue tits typically lay between 8-15 eggs, of which a varying number of young will survive to leave the nest. In some nests, however, all the offspring die before they are old enough to leave the nest. Finding out what causes these cases of complete brood mortality has proven challenging. Does one parent leave all the care to its mate? Can a single parent not cope with the demands? Do both parents decide to desert their brood? To find out, we need to know exactly when parents stop bringing food and when the offspring perish.

Blue tits lay up to 15 eggs. Finding enough food means a lot of work for the parents. Zoom Image
Blue tits lay up to 15 eggs. Finding enough food means a lot of work for the parents.

Therefore, Peter Santema and Bart Kempenaers from the Max Planck Institute for Ornithology in Seewiesen equipped all adult blue tits in their study site with a tiny, passive integrated transponder. They also designed nestboxes with a built-in, automated monitoring system that recorded every visit of a transpondered bird throughout the entire year. With this system, they could analyse all parental visits of 277 nestboxes and determine when a parent was last present at the nest. In case of sudden parental disappearance, they also measured how often the remaining parent visited, both before and after the disappearance of its partner.

Of the 684 nests analysed over seven years, 13 percent suffered complete brood failure. The researchers found that in almost all of these nests, one of the parents had disappeared while the young were still alive. “This raises the question whether one of the parents deserted and left all the care to its partner, or whether the parents were exhausted and simply gave up,” says Bart Kempenaers, who was leading the study. Both scenarios are unlikely, because the researchers found that – with one exception – all birds that had disappeared were never observed again in the study area. Moreover, their nest visit rates were normal up to the moment of disappearance, suggesting that these were otherwise healthy individuals. “All the evidence suggests that death by predation is the most likely cause for the disappearance of a parent”, says Peter Santema, first author of the study. The constant flying to and from the nest makes them vulnerable to predation by aerial predators, in particular the sparrowhawk.

After the disappearance of a parent, the remaining partner substantially increases its effort to raise at least some of the chicks, which turns out to Zoom Image
After the disappearance of a parent, the remaining partner substantially increases its effort to raise at least some of the chicks, which turns out to be often successful.

However, disappearance of one parent does not necessarily mean the end for all young in the brood. In more than two thirds of the cases where one parent disappeared early on, at least some of the nestlings reached the ripe old age of 21 days, when they are fully grown and leave the nest. The likelihood of success was higher when the male disappeared. “Nestlings cannot thermoregulate before their feathers are developed and only females have the ability to keep them warm”, says Peter Santema. This might explain why males were overall less successful as single parents than females.

In other cases, the remaining parent seemed unable to care for the brood on its own. After they became single parents, both males and females substantially increased their nest visit rates, but in unsuccessful broods, visit rates gradually declined. This suggests that all single parents tried to raise the brood, but that some could not keep up with the high demand. As blue tits breed only once a year and are short-lived, the prospects of future reproductive opportunities are low. Hence, it seems unlikely that parents would desert their nestlings by choice.

In contrast to nests that suffered complete brood failure, nests where only part of the offspring died usually had both parents still present. Factors other than the loss of a parent, for instance food shortage or disease, must therefore be responsible for these cases. “Our findings highlight that partial and complete brood morality in blue tits have different causes”, concludes Bart Kempenaers.

 
Go to Editor View
loading content