
For foraging, bats rely almost exclusively on their acoustic sense. Passive-acoustic bats like the greater mouse-eared bat (Myotis myotis) listen to rustling noises generated by their prey. Active-acoustic species find their prey by the echoes of their own ultrasonic calls. Examples of this second group are the natterer's bats (Myotis nattereri) and the greater horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumquinum).
Both groups face a similar problem: the acoustic masking of their prey by either noise of natural or artificial sources (water rustling, traffic noise) or by unwanted echoes of the background vegetation.
We studied the effects of traffic noise on foraging behaviour of the greater mouse-eared bat (Myotis myotis) in a lab experiment. The animals were trained to find a food reward in that one out of 64 platforms that broadcast an insect rustling on leaf clutter. During testing, traffic noise playbacks were run at varying sound levels.The louder the noise, the more the foraging efficiency of the bats decreased (Siemers & Schaub 2011).
Natterer's bats (Myotis nattereri) are real echolocation specialists thanks to their broadbanded calls. They are able to detect and catch prey within a distance of only centimetres to the background clutter (Siemers & Schnitzler 2000). Bats of the non-European families Kerivoulinae and Murininae showed similar abilities in experiments (Schmieder et al. 2010).
Rhinolophid bats have developed yet another strategy to find prey close to vegetation. They use CF (constant frequency) echolocation calls, which get modulated as soon as they meet an insect's fluttering wings. The resulting glints in the echo can be perceived by the bats.